Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 1,023: Line 1,023:  
</div>
 
</div>
   −
=== ''Tattva Vimarsha'' ===
+
=== ''Tattva Vimarsha'' / Fundamental Principles===
 
<div style="text-align:justify;">
 
<div style="text-align:justify;">
 
*The heart is a vital organ with ten channels, circulating ''ojas'', responsible for maintaining life.
 
*The heart is a vital organ with ten channels, circulating ''ojas'', responsible for maintaining life.
Line 1,042: Line 1,042:  
</div>
 
</div>
   −
=== ''Vidhi Vimarsha'' ===
+
=== ''Vidhi Vimarsha'' / Applied Inferences===
 
<div style="text-align:justify;">
 
<div style="text-align:justify;">
 
There are a few compelling similarities between ancient Greek medical literature and Ayurveda.  However, ‘which school of medicine borrowed these ideas from whom?' - Has been an unresolved mystery. Some of the ideas that are significantly common to these two systems are humorism, the mechanism of blood formation, breathing, and circulation. One of the points that are widely debated in this context is the supremacy of brain versus the supremacy of heart. It looks like Hippocrates, Aristotle, Erasistratus and Galen had this confusion over the exact functions of the heart and the brain. They ascribed to the heart the functions such as perception of the sensations, motor control, intellect, emotions, etc. The above verse may be read with this background in mind. <ref name=ref1>Patwardhan K. The history of the discovery of blood circulation: unrecognized contributions of Ayurveda masters. Adv Physiol Educ. 2012 Jun;36(2):77-82. doi: 10.1152/advan.00123.2011.  </ref> Another explanation could, however, be that these vital entities are functionally dependent on the heart, though not exactly located there.
 
There are a few compelling similarities between ancient Greek medical literature and Ayurveda.  However, ‘which school of medicine borrowed these ideas from whom?' - Has been an unresolved mystery. Some of the ideas that are significantly common to these two systems are humorism, the mechanism of blood formation, breathing, and circulation. One of the points that are widely debated in this context is the supremacy of brain versus the supremacy of heart. It looks like Hippocrates, Aristotle, Erasistratus and Galen had this confusion over the exact functions of the heart and the brain. They ascribed to the heart the functions such as perception of the sensations, motor control, intellect, emotions, etc. The above verse may be read with this background in mind. <ref name=ref1>Patwardhan K. The history of the discovery of blood circulation: unrecognized contributions of Ayurveda masters. Adv Physiol Educ. 2012 Jun;36(2):77-82. doi: 10.1152/advan.00123.2011.  </ref> Another explanation could, however, be that these vital entities are functionally dependent on the heart, though not exactly located there.

Navigation menu