Administrators, Editors, Bots, Bureaucrats, Charaksamhita, Moderators (CommentStreams), Interface administrators, Administrators
10,109
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 199:
Line 199: − + + + + +
→20. Purvapaksha (Objection)
===20. Purvapaksha (Objection)===
===20. Purvapaksha (Objection)===
This is the objection raised on a statement. E.g.in Ch.Sha.1.6 , Agnivesha asked Lord Atreya, that if Atma (the soul) is said to be devoid of actions, then how at the same time it is considered as responsible for all the actions? Such questions are asked to initiate a debate, which will ultimately help to understand the scientific truth.
This is the objection raised on a statement. E.g. at different places in Samhita, some objections are raised and then the topic is discussed further in details. The raised objection with proper justification is Purvapaksha. In sixth chapter of [[Sharira Sthana]] the query, if Atma (the soul) is said to be devoid of actions, then how at the same time it is considered as responsible for all the actions? Such questions are asked to initiate a debate, which will ultimately help to understand the scientific truth.
In clinical medicine, the history of a patient is discussed with objections and justifications to reach final diagnosis and proper treatment protocol.
In research, the search begins with objection to existing theories and it is discussed with review of earlier researches done on the topic.
===21. Vidhana (Right interpretation)===
===21. Vidhana (Right interpretation)===