Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  +
{{CiteButton}}
 
{{#seo:
 
{{#seo:
 
|title= Sharira Sankhya Sharira  
 
|title= Sharira Sankhya Sharira  
Line 8: Line 9:  
|type=article
 
|type=article
 
}}
 
}}
   
<big>'''Sharira Sthana Chapter 7. Numerological account of human body constituents '''</big>
 
<big>'''Sharira Sthana Chapter 7. Numerological account of human body constituents '''</big>
 
{{Infobox
 
{{Infobox
Line 22: Line 22:  
|data5 = [[Sutra Sthana]], [[Nidana Sthana]],  [[Vimana Sthana]],  [[Indriya Sthana]], [[Chikitsa Sthana]], [[Kalpa Sthana]], [[Siddhi Sthana]]
 
|data5 = [[Sutra Sthana]], [[Nidana Sthana]],  [[Vimana Sthana]],  [[Indriya Sthana]], [[Chikitsa Sthana]], [[Kalpa Sthana]], [[Siddhi Sthana]]
 
|label6 = Translator and commentator
 
|label6 = Translator and commentator
|data6 = Tiwari S.P., Deole Y. S.
+
|data6 = Tiwari S.P., [[Yogesh Deole|Deole Y. S.]]
 
|label7 = Reviewer  
 
|label7 = Reviewer  
 
|data7  = Patwardhan K., Shilwant A.A
 
|data7  = Patwardhan K., Shilwant A.A
 
|label8 = Editors
 
|label8 = Editors
|data8  = Bhalerao S., Deole Y.S., Basisht G.
+
|data8  = Bhalerao S., [[Yogesh Deole|Deole Y.S.]], [[Gopal Basisht|Basisht G.]]
 
|label9 = Year of publication  
 
|label9 = Year of publication  
 
|data9 =  2020
 
|data9 =  2020
Line 35: Line 35:  
}}
 
}}
 
<big>'''Abstract'''</big>
 
<big>'''Abstract'''</big>
 
+
<p style="text-align:justify;">This chapter is dedicated to numerological account and quantification of human anatomical and physiological constituents. It provides comprehensive knowledge about the organization of the body, its gross and subtle structures. The basic panchabhautika composition of human body is revealed which is helpful in understanding disease pathogenesis and prognosis. In brief, the chapter gives a general picture of how a body is organized by its functional organs, and emphasizes upon the importance of the knowledge of not only gross anatomy but at the cellular and sub cellular level.</br>
<div style="text-align:justify;">This chapter is dedicated to numerological account and quantification of human anatomical and physiological constituents. It provides comprehensive knowledge about the organization of the body, its gross and subtle structures. The basic panchabhautika composition of human body is revealed which is helpful in understanding disease pathogenesis and prognosis. In brief, the chapter gives a general picture of how a body is organized by its functional organs, and emphasizes upon the importance of the knowledge of not only gross anatomy but at the cellular and sub cellular level.</div>
      
'''Keywords''': ''[[Purusha]], Chetana, Koshthanga,'' organs, physiological systems,layers of skin, bones, visceral organs, quantification of body constituents.  
 
'''Keywords''': ''[[Purusha]], Chetana, Koshthanga,'' organs, physiological systems,layers of skin, bones, visceral organs, quantification of body constituents.  
</div>
+
</p>
      Line 926: Line 925:  
''Koshthanga sharira'' presented by Charaka is an exclusive presentation, based on his own ideas and medical values. However he maintained that organs included should be located in the cavities of the trunk specifying to ''koshtha'', just like the clubbing of visceral organs in modern anatomy for practical study. It does not match with Sushruta’s presentation. Among presented fifteen ''koshthangas'' controversial entities are ''nabhi, kloma, pakvashaya'' and ''vapavahan''. For ''nabhi'' opinions available so far are all centered with umbilicus, which is not appropriate because umbilicus is on the body wall it is not located in the ''koshtha''. Mesentery may be most suitable organ to be taken for ''nabhi''. Pancreas having medical relevance related with the symptom of polydipsia seems to be most suitable to be referred for ''kloma'' particularly under Charaka’s ''koshthanga''. Though it is the part of large intestine (''sthulantra'') but caecum is an important structure and a visceral organ, it should be taken for ''pakvashaya''. Some scholars have correlated duodenum with ''pakvashaya'' which is not authentic any way as it does not hold digested food, its function is to deal with likely undigested food (chyme). No doubt ''vapavahana'' as referred by Chakrapani is a ''tailvartika'' but omentum does not fit completely with the description of ''vapavahana''. This is also denied by Prof. V.J. Thakkar<ref> Thakkar V.J., Purusha Vichaya, A. H. Publishers, Gujarat Ayurved University, Jamnagar, India </ref>. He has referred lacteals to be taken for it. Lacteals are also not the better option. Why not thoracic duct because it is found in singular number? As such thoracic duct is recommended here in this account to be taken for ''vapavahana''.
 
''Koshthanga sharira'' presented by Charaka is an exclusive presentation, based on his own ideas and medical values. However he maintained that organs included should be located in the cavities of the trunk specifying to ''koshtha'', just like the clubbing of visceral organs in modern anatomy for practical study. It does not match with Sushruta’s presentation. Among presented fifteen ''koshthangas'' controversial entities are ''nabhi, kloma, pakvashaya'' and ''vapavahan''. For ''nabhi'' opinions available so far are all centered with umbilicus, which is not appropriate because umbilicus is on the body wall it is not located in the ''koshtha''. Mesentery may be most suitable organ to be taken for ''nabhi''. Pancreas having medical relevance related with the symptom of polydipsia seems to be most suitable to be referred for ''kloma'' particularly under Charaka’s ''koshthanga''. Though it is the part of large intestine (''sthulantra'') but caecum is an important structure and a visceral organ, it should be taken for ''pakvashaya''. Some scholars have correlated duodenum with ''pakvashaya'' which is not authentic any way as it does not hold digested food, its function is to deal with likely undigested food (chyme). No doubt ''vapavahana'' as referred by Chakrapani is a ''tailvartika'' but omentum does not fit completely with the description of ''vapavahana''. This is also denied by Prof. V.J. Thakkar<ref> Thakkar V.J., Purusha Vichaya, A. H. Publishers, Gujarat Ayurved University, Jamnagar, India </ref>. He has referred lacteals to be taken for it. Lacteals are also not the better option. Why not thoracic duct because it is found in singular number? As such thoracic duct is recommended here in this account to be taken for ''vapavahana''.
 
</div>
 
</div>
 +
 +
<big>'''[[Special:ContactMe|Send us your suggestions and feedback on this page.]]'''</big>
 +
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
  

Navigation menu